Pedophiles Demand their Rights — Is NAMBLA the New Normal?

Pedophiles demand their rights.

Is pedophilia the next new normal?

Pedophiles demand their rights, that is, the right to have homosexual sex with children. In the new bizarro Liberal world of the Social Justice Warrior’s promoted tolerance, will NAMBLA’s raison d’être of man/boy love gain acceptance? It’s already in the works.  

Will someone be scolded for making jokes about pedophiles, much as Clint Eastwood was for making jokes about Caitlyn Jenner? You can almost count on it because pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government and the White House approves.

Schools are being forced to accept adult illegals into high schools and middle schools because federal law doesn’t allow the schools to verify a students’ age.

So, you have to ask yourself: will the 35 year old man from Guatemala that no one can ask any questions about, who is sitting at the desk next to your child in school and ogling him and drooling over him commit some heinous act? Not if Obama has anything to say about it because he and his Social Justice Warriors will have demoted the words heinous act to the unspeakable H-word and such behavior will protected not only under the law but also under the banner of political correctness.

If you’re interested, you can go to NAMBLA’s website to read their stories about man/boy love or to find out why NAMBLA matters, according to them.


From the Northern Colorado Gazette by Jack Minor:

Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals

Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.

Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.

In 1998 The APA [American Psychiatric Association] issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from  childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

The LGBT flag

Ha, it’s all about life, healing, sunlight, nature, serenity, and spirit. And you thought it was all about sex. Get your mind out of the gutter.

Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term.

Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”

The White House praised the bill saying, “At root, this isn’t just about our laws; this is about who we are as a people. This is about whether we value one another  — whether we embrace our differences rather than allowing them to become a source of animus.” . . .

Read the whole article.


From Shenandoah by John Galt:

A Supreme Court Victory for NAMBLA

The Nambla Logo

The NAMBLA logo shown on their website sports the same rainbow colors as the love, peace, and happiness LGBT rainbow flag.

Under Sharia Law it has been a long standing practice where the male had the choice of a mate regardless of age as long as she was “pure.” The best way to ensure purity was to find a girl between the ages of six and twelve which was a practice accepted since Aisha married the prophet Mohammed when she was around six to seven years old.  In most Islamic cultures, the activity of marrying a child of purity to ensure that Allah would smile upon the offspring has been an accepted practice up to and including the use of financial transactions of wealthier Muslims providing dowries to lower caste citizens for attractive daughters for the purpose of  marriage and procreation. While this activity might sound shocking to the average American, in many parts of the world this an accepted cultural norm, providing the poor or lower middle class within many societies an opportunity to advance and provide for their families and improve the lot of their family name.

This brings us full circle to the North American Man Boy Love Association, aka, “NAMBLA.”

What does “NAMBLA” have to do with Islam? Nothing. 100% zero, zip, nada. However, the ideals endorsed by Justice Kennedy’s majority decision have everything to do with American reality and the ability of a forty year old man to marry a twelve year old boy or girl. Let us keep this in context however of the limitations of the two decisions from last week. Despite the cheery proclamations of the “conservative” media that this was no big deal, in reality the rights to marry whomever one loves or within the religious sphere of desire has now been extended across all cultural and societal aspects of America. If a Muslim wishes to have 4 wives, technically speaking under Kennedy’s majority opinion, how can any court block such a desire or recognition of the ceremony?

Thus one has to ask, under the equal protection clause and other creations expanded by the Supreme Court, how can any Federal or State court block a twenty-five year old man from marrying a thirteen year old girl based on the precepts of Islam or any other religion? Expanding that idea further, what happens when the IRS is used to “acknowledge” and legitimize the “Church of the Fuzzy Apricot” in the Castro District of San Francisco, California and adult males establish as part of their beliefs that marrying young boys is part of their accepted norm? . . .

Read the whole article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.