Gaia Lives! Watch Her Breathe

Gaia lives

Gaia lives! See, here she is captured in an old B&W photo.

Gaia lives — Hark all ye non believers, Gaia is Real. Here she is caught in the act of breathing as captured by a smart phone, and walking amongst the flora and fauna in this old black and white photo from the days when the Kodak Brownie Camera was king. Listen carefully to what she is saying to the goat, the wolf, and suckling infant child.

She’s crying over that damned Obama, the Devil’s spawn and how he’s trying to starve the forests of their lifeblood, that most sacred CO2.

ISIS Jihadi Blown Up by Artillery Shell

ISIS Jihadi blown up by artillery shell while making propaganda video caught on film. Not for the faint of heart or easily triggered.

From SHTFplan.com by Mac Slavo:

VAPORIZED: The Moment An Islamic Extremist Filming A Propaganda Video Is Wiped Out By An Artillery Shell

When propaganda takes a 180° turn: ISIS Jihadi blown up by artillery shell.

When propaganda takes a 180° turn: ISIS Jihadi blown up by artillery shell. Oops! That went well. Join up now?

The Islamic State loves to share propaganda videos of beheadings and mass murders of innocent victims, including children and those whose only crime against Islam is that they are Christians.

Thus, it is with great pleasure and a smile that we share the following short video clip from the Syrian border in which an Al-Queda affiliated Islamist rebel filming his latest propaganda video is vaporized by a mortar shell.

Standing in front of a makeshift bunker, the man is speaking about his pride over capturing . . .

Read more

Is Obama a Traitor: the Secret Leader of ISIL?

Is Obama a traitor

Harun meets with Charlemagne. A Caliphate needs a Caliph — Is Obama a traitor or the secret leader, the Caliph, of ISIS which he so fondly calls ISIL.

Why is it that Obama always refers to ISIS (Islamic state of Iraq and Syria — I thought he said it had nothing to do with Muslims) as ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant)?

And why is it that he always refers to ISIS as a Caliphate when ISIS has no Caliph? Could Obama be the Caliph of the Caliphate he refers to as ISIL? Is Obama a traitor and the secret leader, the Caliph, of ISIS?

There is no doubt now that the United States and its NATO ally Turkey back ISIS with arms and cash, and as far as Obama goes, apparently moral support, aka giving aid and comfort to the enemy. But just what is it he means when he says ISIL and not ISIS? Is it a coded message to Jihadi fighters to keep fighting, to not worry: America’s got your back.

Whatever the case may be, Barry is no Harun al-Rashid (See Rock Hudson in The Golden Blade).


From Now the End Begins:

Decoding Obama’s speech reveals some startling revelations

ISIL stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. Now, to us Westerners we don’t really make much of a distinction, do we? No, honestly from our perspective its all about the same. But how would a Muslim living in the Middle East view it? Just what is the Levant anyway? Let’s take a look. …

… When Barack Obama refers over and over to the Islamic State as ISIL, he is sending a message to Muslims all over the Middle East that he personally does not recognize Israel as a sovereign nation, but as territory belonging to the Islamic State. …

Read the whole article.

Trump remembers muslims cheering on 9-11 and he won’t back down

9-11 Statue of liberyTrump remembers and he won’t back down

Trump remembers muslims cheering on 9-11 — Of Course there were reports of Muslims cheering when the twin towers came down: I remember the reports on the news at the time. And of course they’re going to try to flush it down the memory hole just like they did with Barbara Bush on the Larry King Show.

Remember that one? When Larry King interviewed George H.W. Bush, King George The First, and his wife Barbara about New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina, and the people sheltered at the Superdome? When Barbara Bush uttered the unbelievable words, “I don’t know what they’re complaining about: they’re all underprivileged people anyway,” and H.W. looked at her like, hey, I thought our conversations at home were private? Well, that video clip has been flushed so deep down the hole that no one is going to be able to dig it out. Think you saw it? Never happened — You must be hallucinating.

File:Donald Trump by Gage Skidmore.jpg

Image Credits: By Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons

Trump has people trying to find the original news reports, but even with his resources, good look with that. It’s buried wherever it is that the truth goes to die. But a lot of people are coming forward to say that they witnessed the event. Will they all be discredited as victims of some sort of mass hallucination? Of course they will, either that or liars. How long will it be before we hear that the booing and shouting and screaming Allahu Akbar during the moment of silence for the victims Paris terror attacks that broke out at the Turkey vs. Greece soccer game held in Turkey never happened? How long will it be before that gets flushed down the memory hole. If Obama and the collectivist Left has anything to say about it. ASAP!


From MSN via The Hill:

Trump on 9/11 claims: ‘I’m not going to take it back’

Billionaire Donald Trump is defending his disputed claim that “thousands” of Muslims in New Jersey cheered the fall of the twin towers on 9/11.

“You’re running for president of the United States. Your words matter. Truthfulness matters,” said Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s “Meet The Press,” after Trump claimed that comments by people on Twitter and at his events validated his 9/11 assertion.

“Take it easy, Chuck. Just play cool,” responded Trump, the GOP front-runner.

“This is people in this country that love our country that saw this, by the hundreds they’re calling, and they’re tweeting,” he added.

“And there’s a lot of people. In Sarasota, people were telling me yesterday they used to live in New Jersey. They remember it vividly. They thought it was disgusting.”

At one point in the interview, a frustrated Todd said: “But Mr. Trump, this didn’t happen in New Jersey. . . .

Read the whole article.


Don’t be bullied by SJWs. Don’t take anything back; always stand your ground.

When It Comes to Self Defense Do Old Guys Have to Play Fair?

Self Defense do old guys have to play fair?

Put up your dukes, you’ll not have your way with me. Self Defense do old guys have to play fair?

Self Defense do old guys have to play fair? What’s a fair fight? What are the limits of self defense? If an old white guy is attacked by some young punk, does he have to fight it out mano e mano till he drops dead from a heart attack, or can he pull out a gun, shrug his shoulders and shoot the guy dead. The Chuck Norris Rule demands that force can only be met with equal force. The Chicago Way, on the other hand, from the movie The Untouchables demands that: If he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue! In two recent cases, much to the chagrin of the anti-gun crowd, it was the latter that prevailed.

From Taki’s Magazine by David Cole:

Old White Guys and the Chuck Norris Rule

In two separate but similar criminal cases that were resolved this year, a precedent was established that will possibly, hopefully, influence prosecutors in the years to come: Elderly white guys are not legally mandated to play by the “Chuck Norris rule” if they believe their lives are at risk.

What’s the Chuck Norris rule? As anyone who’s ever seen his family-friendly brand of martial-arts ass-kicking knows, the Chuck Norris rule is simple: Force can only be met with equal but not greater force. An evil ninja comes at you with fists, you use fists to defeat him. Kicks can be met with kicks. Weapons like a staff or a sword are only allowable when the bad guys use them first. And a gun? That’s only a permissible line of defense when the villain is firing directly at you with intent to kill.

In the Chuck Norris universe, this type of proportional response to villainy is mandated. It’s why, for eight seasons, CBS was able to promote Walker, Texas Ranger as family-friendly entertainment.

* * *
Like all elderly people, aging whites will become increasingly susceptible to crime, and matters relating to self-defense will become more and more important. Which is why I consider it a small victory that this year, two separate attempts to penalize old white men for not abiding by the Chuck Norris rule failed miserably.

* * *
In July 2014, 80-year-old Long Beach resident Tom Greer had the utter gall to think he could just waltz into his own house after spending an evening out. Unfortunately, his act of aggression—coming home—surprised two local thugs (both with a history of crimes against the elderly) who were in the process of ransacking Greer’s house when the old man returned. The criminals—a 26-year-old man and a 28-year-old woman—began mercilessly beating Greer, breaking his collarbone and knocking him to the floor. As the male robber tried to force open Greer’s safe, the female continued the attack, stomping on the helpless octogenarian. Finally, she left to help her boyfriend with the safe, giving Greer time to crawl toward where he kept his .22 Smith & Wesson. . . . “Greer should have called police and waited for them to arrive,” said Navarrette, a vocal gun-control advocate.

* * *
And in another case: 74-year-old Wayne Burgarello, a retired schoolteacher. Burgarello had the nerve to own a rental unit, a duplex, that he wasn’t using (greedy white man! So many people can’t afford one home, and he dares to have two?). A heroic junkie decided to break into the duplex and use it as her own personal medicinal meth clinic. Burgarello had been becoming more and more agitated about break-ins and thefts at the duplex, so one evening he decided to drop by, foolishly thinking he had the right to visit his property anytime he wanted. After calling out a warning demanding that any trespassers leave, Burgarello entered. . . .

Read the whole article.


The Clint Eastwood Rule, the antithesis of the Chuck Norris Rule: Counter your adversaries with overwhelming force


The Adventures of Ford Fairlane Rule, as seen at the end of the movie: Challenge the other guy’s masculinity by daring him to go mano e mano, and when he puts down his gun shoot him with yours. A version of this can be seen in this Star Trek clip:

Brits Drop Trial of Man Accused of Arming Terrorists to Avoid Exposing British Intelligence for Doing Same Thing

Brits drop trial of man accused of arming terrorists

All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players. Manipulated like pawns on a chess board, Kipling’s “great game” continues.

Brits drop trial of man accused of arming terrorists

A New World Order — Order out of chaos in the name of the King

Brits drop trial of man accused of arming terrorists — A good lawyer is worth his weight in gold.

From The Guardian, by Seumas Milne:

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq

Obama Drops Leaflets Gives ISIS 45 Minute Warning Before Oil Tanker Airstrike

America’s way of waging war vs. Russia’s way of waging war

America drops leaflets . . .

isil-airstrikes-flyer-600

. . . while Russia drops bombs.

Obama drops leaflets gives ISIS 45 minute warning before oil tanker airstrike — WTF? Is this guy serious?


From Infowars by Paul Joseph Watson:

The Obama White House is giving ISIS a 45 minute warning before bombing their oil tankers by dropping leaflets advising potential jihadists to flee before air strikes in Syria.

“Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life,” the leaflet reads.

The leaflet drops are justified under the premise that the oil tanker drivers might be civilians and not ISIS recruits, although it’s an explanation that doesn’t wash with critics.

“It’s not like these drivers are innocent, uninvolved ‘civilians’ like children or sick people,” writes J.E. Dyer. “They’re waging ISIS’s war, just like the other non-uniformed participants who make up 100% of ISIS’s ranks. This is how far the Obama administration is going to avoid “collateral damage” — and who knows, it may be worse.”

FrontPageMag’s Daniel Greenfield makes a similar point, commenting, “So after all this time, they came up with a great plan; drop flyers on ISIS trucks so that the drivers, who may or may not be ISIS members, can run away in time. Meanwhile ISIS gets 45 minutes of warning.”

Compare the Obama White House’s approach to fighting ISIS to that of Russia.

While it took the U.S. fifteen months to even begin targeting ISIS’ oil refineries and tankers, air strikes by Moscow destroyed more than 1,000 tankers in a period of just five days.

In comparison, Col. Steve Warren said that the U.S. had taken out only 116 tanker trucks, the “first strike” to target ISIS’ lucrative black market oil business, which funds over 50 per cent of the terror group’s activities.

U.S. air strikes targeting ISIS oil assets are so rare that PBS was caught using footage of Russian fighter jets bombing an oil storage facility in Syria and passing it off as evidence of the U.S. targeting the Islamic State’s oil infrastructure. . . .

Read the whole article

 

Lord Monckton on Paris: Global Warming, Terrorism

Lord Monckton @ 55:101:57:28 of the video; on climate change @ 1:14:521:42:35 and 1:56:001:57:28.


Lord Monckton on Paris: Global Warming, Terrorism —

Lord Monckton on Paris: Global Warming, Terrorism — Skeptics throw water on global warming idea.

Lord Monckton on Paris: Global Warming, Terrorism — Skeptics throw water on global warming idea.

On terrorism: How we ended terrorism in Ireland.

On global warming/climate change: Sir David King, the UK’s chief scientist on global warming and chief negotiator at the current Paris summit, was invited to a 2004 international conference on global warming in Moscow. When he saw that he would have to debate skeptics, he tried to get back on his plane and leave but was arrested and forced to make his presentation, but he would not debate. He was told he was a disgrace then allowed to go.

Hillary Clinton: Muslims have nothing To Do With Terrorism

Hillary Clinton: Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism

Hillary Clinton: Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism.  Clinton giving testimony to the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Is Hillary living in an alternative reality? Or is she beginning to believe her own lies?

Hillary Clinton: Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Bullshit. So why is it that 63 million Muslims from around the world support ISIS? This may play well to the base, but . . . Spread it thin, Hill, it’s a big farm. and you might just be beginning to lose some credibility. Or are we past that point?


From WND by Douglas Ernst:

Hillary: Muslims ‘have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism’

Hillary Clinton sees zero connection between Islamic terrorist networks seeking to create a “would-be caliphate,” the “radical jihadism” they preach, and Islam.

The Democrat front-runner for her party’s 2016 presidential nomination said Friday, “Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

The former secretary of state made the comment while speaking before the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Thursday. . . .

Read the whole article.


From the American Thinker by Sierra Rayne:

Pew poll: Between 63 million and 287 million ISIS supporters in just 11 countries

A new poll by the Pew Research Center reveals significant levels of support for ISIS within the Muslim world.  In 11 representative nation-states, up to 14 percent of the population has a favorable opinion of ISIS, and upwards of 62 percent “don’t know” whether or not they have a favorable opinion of the Islamist group.

In Pakistan, a nuclear weapons state, only 28 percent of the public view ISIS unfavorably.  By this overwhelming degree of either tacit support or tolerance for ISIS in the country, ISIS should be considered as a potential proxy nuclear weapons power via its linkages and support within Pakistan.

When broken down by ethnicity and religion, the results are equally troubling.  In Israel, 4 percent of its Arab population – which equates to more than 66,000 individuals – have a favorable view of ISIS.  For Gaza and the West Bank, 5 and 8 percent, respectively, also hold a favorable view of ISIS.  In Nigeria, the ISIS favorability rating among the Muslim population soars to 20 percent.  Another 12 percent of Muslims in Malaysia take a similar positive view of ISIS.

Substantial support for ISIS also exists . . .

Read whole article.

 

Hillary Clinton Will Be Indicted Before Election; Trump Will be Elected President — Dr. Jerome Corsi

Hillary Clinton will be indicted — Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND.com on Hillary Clinton @ 23:35–29:00: excerpts from the above . . .

Obama’a essentially gonna throw Hillary under the bus: blame Hillary for the Middle East. I believe Hillary Clinton will be under criminal indictment before the election, likely from both the Department of Justice and also the states.

Bill and Hillary Clinton are going to be prosecuted in the states for the foundation; they can lose control over the foundation.

Hillary Clinton will be indicted before electdion

Hillary Clinton will be indicted before election

The Democrats, I think, have resolved that they’re gonna lose this election. Hillary’s been picked to take the fall. Obama’s gonna clear out the old Hillary Clinton wing of the Democratic party — Obama’s gonna take the Clintons down.

The Democrats are going to get more radical, and they’re going to try to align with the forces in the universities to do an Ayres style revolution.

The Clinton Foundation will be put into receivership . . . The Clintons will lose control of the foundation . . . and the Democratic party will move far to the left . . .

The Clintons are criminals and they’re going to go down. They’re going to be thrown down and thrown down hard . . .

The left overplayed it’s hand . . .