ISIS Attacks US — Do they Really Hate Us for Our Freedom?


ISIS attacks US. Thanks, Obama: Chief recruiter for ISIS.

“What if you learned that most of the people killed by U.S. drones are civilians? That the pilots “double-tap,” meaning that they send a missile into a wedding party or a house and then wait for people to try to help the injured and send a second missile into them? That as a result one hears the injured screaming for hours until they die, as no one comes to help?”

— Well, God bless America. Thanks, Obama: Chief recruiter for ISIS, or ISIL as he likes to call it.

ISIS attacks US — During WWII, there was a top secret training camp in Canada known as Camp-X. Supposedly unknown to even the Canadian government, it’s mission was to train commandos to keep fighting, even if the Allies lost, even if the government ordered them to stand down. They also recruited saboteurs from Europe, people whose families had been killed by the Nazis, people who had lost everything and whose only purpose was to exact revenge, no matter if it cost them their lives. After reading David Swanson’s Washington blog article, ask yourself, do they really hate us for our freedom?

Do Mass Killings Bother You?

From Washington’s Blog by DavidSwanson:

We now know this. A young man who had successfully killed on a large scale went to his religious leader with doubts and was told that mass killing was part of God’s plan. The young man continued killing until he had participated in killing sprees that took 1,626 lives — men, women, and children.

I repeat: his death count was not the 16 or 9 or 22 lives that make top news stories, but 1,626 dead and mutilated bodies.

Do such things bother you?

What if you learned that this young man’s name was Brandon Bryant, and that he killed as a drone pilot for the U.S. Air Force, and that he was presented with a certificate for his 1,626 kills and congratulated on a job well done by the United States of America? What if you learned that his religious leader was a Christian chaplain?

Do such things still bother you?

What if you learned that most of the people killed by U.S. drones are civilians? That the pilots “double-tap,” meaning that they send a missile into a wedding party or a house and then wait for people to try to help the injured and send a second missile into them? That as a result one hears the injured screaming for hours until they die, as no one comes to help? That a drone pilot sent a missile into a group of children from which three children survived who recognized their dead brothers but had no idea that various pieces of flesh were what was left of their Mom and Dad and consequently cried out for those now gone-forever individuals?

Is this troubling?

What if President Obama’s claim of few or no civilian deaths was proven false by well-documented reporting? And by the fact that most victims are targeted without even . . .

Read the whole article.

Massive NSA Spying Did Not Stop San Bernardino; Why?


Looking for a needle in a haystack. Massive NSA spying did not stop San Bernardino.

Massive NSA spying did not stop San Bernardino. How can that be? When you hear everything you hear nothing: nothing but noise. If you’re looking for a needle in a haystack it helps to know where to look. Looking at everybody is the same as looking at nobody: there’s just too much data too sift through.

From Washington’s Blog:

NSA Admits It Collects Too MUCH Info to Stop Terror Attacks

The Problem Isn’t Too Little Spying … It’s Too Much

Top security experts agree that mass surveillance is ineffective … and actually makes us MORE vulnerable to terrorism.

For example, the former head of the NSA’s global intelligence gathering operations – Bill Binney – says that the mass surveillance INTERFERES with the government’s ability to catch bad guys, and that the government failed to stop 9/11, the Boston Bombing, the Texas shootings and other terror attacks is because it was overwhelmed with data from mass surveillance on Americans.

Binney told Washington’s Blog:

A good deal of the failure is, in my opinion, due to bulk data. So, I am calling all these attacks a result of “Data bulk failure.” Too much data and too many people for the 10-20 thousand analysts to follow. Simple as that. Especially when they make word match pulls (like Google) and get dumps of data selected from close to 4 billion people.

This is the same problem NSA had before 9/11. They had data that could have prevented 9/11 but did not know they had it in their data bases. This back then when the bulk collection was not going on. Now the problem is orders of magnitude greater. Result, it’s harder to succeed.

Expect more of the same from our deluded government that thinks more data improves possibilities of success. All this bulk data collection and storage does give law enforcement a great capability to retroactively analyze anyone they want. But, of course,that data cannot be used in court since . . .

Read the whole article.

San Bernardino Terrorism or Disgruntled Worker?


San Bernardino terrorism or disgruntled worker? Or was it, as one writer suggests, a lack of maternity leave?

San Bernardino terrorism or disgruntled worker? The media has been pushing really hard to make the attacks in San Bernardino all about workplace violence, aka going postal, with one CNN analyst suggesting the attack may have taken place because attacker Syed Farook was not offered a safe-space at work where he could snuggle his blankie and suck on his pacifier, or, perhaps, was it because his place of employment dared to call what should have been called a Festivus party a Christmas Party — being politically incorrect does have its consequences, you know.

But the excerpt shown below from Taki Magazine has to take the cake, blaming lack of paternity leave for setting off the attack. At first I thought it was satire, but, no, after reading it, you have to come to the conclusion that this far-out, batshit crazy extrapolation is for real.

Yes, having a newborn is difficult, and all of us who have children have suffered through it. But how many people do you know that just had a baby that arm themselves to the hilt, make improvised explosive devices, suit up in body armor, and after leaving the baby with Grandma, go out and slaughter as many people as possible.

Whatever the final story may turn out to be, the Left jumped on it as reason to outlaw guns before any of the facts were in and won’t let go of this opportunity for Obama to kill the second amendment. Again, this was another attack in a “gun-free” zone, which should be called killing zones, where victims have little choice but to sit there and wait to die while waiting for the police to arrive who never come in time. And once they do arrive, they take a damned long time standing around assessing the situation while victims continue to die.

One thing is for certain, and that is that attacks rarely happen in places where citizens might be armed, and when they do occur the attackers may be able to kill one or to people, but then it is they who get shot next.

From Taki Magazine by Gavin McInnes:

What’s Really Behind the San Bernardino Shooting: Paternity Leave

The first thing I thought when I heard the names of Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, was “They sound like new parents.” Sure enough, the couple had a baby six months ago and had the tenacity to drop it off at Grandma’s before the shooting. America is the only country in the developed world with zero days’ paternity leave. In Iceland, fathers get 120 days off with 80% of their original wages. They don’t have shootings in Iceland. The police shot a man dead for the first time there two years ago and apologized immediately. Police here rarely apologize when they kill someone and they’re usually killing someone who is stressed out. Raising a 6-month-old is a living hell that wears on your psyche every waking moment (which is a good 20 hours a day). Men go nuts from lack of sleep and women often get postpartum depression. Syed and Tashfeen likely had a deadly combo of both. Instead of trying to relieve that stress, the government is busy letting the carnage explode around us.

Obama has created millions of jobs and has tried to make employees feel comfortable, but big business doesn’t like helping anyone but themselves. They only pay about $10 billion a year promoting multiculturalism and it’s not even close to enough. Minorities in the workplace are almost as stressed out as new parents. Who could forget Jah’Keem Yisrael, the mild-mannered employee of Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma who was fired so severely, he was forced to sever a co-worker’s head in retaliation? How bad do things have to get before we wake up and commit to allocating more tax dollars to making workplace violence a thing of the past? This attack came only a few years after Nidal Hasan became so disenfranchised . . .

Read the whole article.

CNN analyst speculates: Was it lack of a “safe-space” at work that caused Sayed Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik to go off the deep end?

Or was it calling the annual Christmas party a Christmas party and not referring to it by some more politically correct name?

Miami Police Execute Man in the Street

Miami Police execute man in the street: There was no need for this the man presented no immediate danger to the police who surrounded him.

Now watch how police handle a similar but much more dangerous situation in Columbia, what most would consider a third world country where life is supposedly cheap. Not a single shot was fired.

Police Now Steal More Than Criminals


Your money or your life. Police now steal more than criminals

Police now steal more than criminals — Seems that nowadays your in much more danger of being robbed by the police than common criminals.

Police are allowed by law to seize any money you might be carrying, such as in your wallet, and then it’s up to you to prove it didn’t come from criminal activity like selling drugs. It doesn’t matter if you have a receipt proving you just withdrew it from the bank: they’ll take it anyway.

Some cops and prosecutors have taken seized money for their own personal use — to pay debts, throw parties, go to bars, gamble, hire prostitutes — but it seems that law enforcement has no problem with that: Why ruin a good thing when there’s plenty for the taking. See here and here.

American Cops Now Steal More Property than All US Burglars Combined

From The Free Thought Project by Matt Agorist

The 1980’s-era laws were designed to drain resources from powerful criminal organizations, but CAF has become a tool for law enforcement agencies across the U.S. to steal money and property from countless innocent people.

No criminal charge is required for this confiscation, resulting in easy inflows of cash for law enforcement departments and the proliferation of abuse. This phenomenon is known as “policing for profit.”

In the last 25 years, the amount of “profit” stolen through CAF has skyrocketted.

According to the US Department of Justice, the value of asset forfeiture recoveries by US authorities from 1989-2010 was $12,667,612,066, increasing on average 19.5% per year.

Read the whole article.

Greeks told to declare Cash Under the Mattress

From bail-outs to bail-ins, now they're going after cash under the mattress

From bail-outs to bail-ins — Greeks told to declare cash under the mattress.

Greeks told to declare cash under the mattress — After the Cyprus Bail-ins, people in countries like Greece got the idea that maybe putting money in the bank wasn’t such a smart idea. For people in countries like America who think something like that could never happen here, the G20’s November 2014, Brisbane Summit makes bail-ins in America a likely eventuality. Of course, just as has always been the case, once you put money in the bank, it’s no longer yours: you just have a claim on it. And your claim is not first in line but comes after banks pay their obligations to each other on bets they’ve placed on risky derivatives.

From Barnaby is right:

In the US, depositors have actually been put in a worse position than Cyprus deposit-holders, at least if they are at the big banks that play in the derivatives casino. The regulators have turned a blind eye as banks use their depositories to fund derivatives exposures. And as bad as that is, the depositors, unlike their Cypriot confreres, aren’t even senior creditors. Remember Lehman? When the investment bank failed, unsecured creditors (and remember, depositors are unsecured creditors) got eight cents on the dollar. . . . More

So what’s a person to do, put it in a safety deposit box? After reading this excerpt from an article from ABC News about how California robbed the contents of paid up, active safe deposit boxes the answer should be probably not.

. . . San Francisco resident Carla Ruff’s safe-deposit box was drilled, seized, and turned over to the state of California, marked “owner unknown.”

“I was appalled,” Ruff said. “I felt violated.”

Unknown? Carla’s name was right on documents in the box at the Noe Valley Bank of America location. So was her address — a house about six blocks from the bank. Carla had a checking account at the bank, too — still does — and receives regular statements. Plus, she has receipts showing she’s the kind of person who paid her box rental fee. And yet, she says nobody ever notified her.

“They are zealously uncovering accounts that are not unclaimed,” Ruff said.

To make matters worse, Ruff discovered the loss when she went to her box to retrieve important paperwork she needed because her husband was dying. Those papers had been shredded.

And that’s not all. Her great-grandmother’s precious natural pearls and other jewelry had been auctioned off. They were sold for just $1,800, even though they were appraised for $82,500.

“These things were things that she gave to me,” Ruff said. “I valued them because I loved her.”

Bank of America told ABC News it deeply regrets the situation and appreciates the difficulty of what Mrs. Ruff was going through. The bank has reached a settlement with Ruff and continues to update its unclaimed property procedures as laws change.


Ruff is not alone. Attorney Bill Palmer represents her and countless other citizens in a class action lawsuit against the state of California.

“They figured the safety-deposit box was safer than keeping it under the mattress,” Palmer said. “In the case of a lot of citizens, they were wrong, weren’t they?” . . . More

So, neither bank deposits nor safe deposit boxes are safe from bank or government theft, leaving people the choice of keeping their cash under the mattress, in a safe, or buried somewhere. But with Greeks told to declare cash under the mattress, it looks like governments will now be going after even that.

From Zero Hedge by Tyler Durden:

Greeks Told To Declare Cash Under The Mattress, Jewelry And Precious Stones

When earlier today we read a report in the Greek Enikonomia, according to which Greek taxpayers would be forced to declare all cash “under the mattress” (including inside) or boxes that contain more than 15,000 euros as well as jewelry and precious stones (including gold) worth over 30,000 euros, starting in 2016, we assumed this has to be some early April fools joke or a mistake.

After all, this would be merely the first step toward full-blown asset confiscation, conducted so many times by insolvent governments throughout history, once the government cracks down on those who made a “mistake” in their asset declaration form or simply refuse to fill such a declaration, thereby making all their assets eligible for government confiscation.

It was not a joke.

Here is the take of Keep Talking Greece, whose stunned response mirrors ours.

Cash “under the mattress” totaling more than 15,000 euro, jewelry and other valuable items such as diamonds and gemstones, should be declared to electronic system of tax authorities, Taxisnet, as of 1 January 2016. Next to properties and vehicles and shares, now the taxpayers will also have to declare their deposits. And not only that. They will have to fill if they rent bank lockers and if yes, also the name of the bank and the branch, even if abroad. . . .

Read the whole article.

Bill Nye — Climate Change Causes Terrorism

The Gods wreak havoc with their climate changing machine, but, according to Bill Nye — Climate change causes terrorism

The Gods wreak havoc with their climate changing machine, but, according to Bill Nye — Climate change causes terrorism

Bill Nye — Climate Change Causes Terrorism. Bill Nye The Science Guy explains cause and effect and blames climate change for terrorist attacks in Paris and stretches credulity to the breaking point. “It’s very reasonable that the recent trouble in Paris is a result of climate change.” So there you have it according to globalist prostitute Bill Nye — Climate change causes terrorism.

George Soros and the Rights of Man — Soros Groups Thrown Out of Russia

Image Credits: Copyright World Economic Forum. by Sebastian Derungs, Wikimedia Commons

Image Credits: Copyright World Economic Forum. by Sebastian Derungs, Wikimedia Commons

Soros Groups thrown out of Russia? International Arrest warrant issued for George Soros? George Soros, Democratic defender of the rights of man?

Now there’s a surprise. This alleged Rothschild front, convicted felon, backer of Occupy Wall Street, prime mover of the NWO, divide and conquer, order out of chaos (see: here and here) specialist who has his footprint stamped on riots, unrest, and trouble all around the world has been asked to leave?

No wonder the State Department is pissed: Putin has been exposing all of their demon seed.

George Soros groups thrown out of Russia — State Department ‘troubled’ by Moscow’s move against Soros groups

No wonder the State Department is pissed: Putin has been exposing their demon see.

No wonder the State Department is pissed: Putin has been exposing all of their demon seed.

From Fox News

The U.S. State Department says it is “troubled” by Russia’s decision to ban two of liberal billionaire George Soros’ pro-democracy charities and label the organizations a threat to national security.

“Today’s designation of the Open Society Foundations and the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation as so-called ‘undesirable’ organizations will only further restrict the work of civil society in Russia for the benefit of the Russian people,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Monday. . . .

Read the whole article.

President Putin Stamping Out The Rothschild Rockefeller Syndicate Maggots From Russia!

From Political Vel Craft:


Soros groups thrown out of Russia —Russia Tells United States Citizens Not To Give Up Your Guns: We Learned From Experience Fighting Rothschild’s Banking Schemes!

In the corridors of Western power, Vladimir Putin is not popular. He has a disconcerting habit of getting things done.

Putin, a Russian patriot, started to reshape covert geopolitical power structures when he and his colleagues moved to stamp out the influence of the Rothschild and Rockefeller syndicate maggots at work inside Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989-90.

These parasites, mostly oligarchs, mummy-got-me-ready chess players, and P2 Lodge mafia proxies, were agents of the G7 Nazi continuum. Their aim was to secure Russian oil and gas to prop up the US petrodollar Ponzi nexus. They failed and, from 1998 onwards, Vladimir Putin made sure that they failed publicly.

Just as the Soviet Union was deliberately collapsed by the G7 élite syndicates, it had been deliberately constructed to fail by a previous generation of those same puppeteers many decades earlier. . . .

Read the whole article.

Vladimir Putin: Russia Issues International Arrest Warrant For Soros

From Political Vel Craft:

Putin Issues Arrest Warrant for Financial Terrorist George Soros!! Financial terrorist and Hungarian bank dick, Convicted Felon George Soros… Russian Intelligence has fingered Soros for using cross-collateralized compounded Swedish and Danish foreign currency derivatives for the purpose of an attack on the Russian stock market.. Soros’ use of these cross-collateralized compounded derivatives utilizing Luxembourg banks violates the terms of the Basil II European Union banking agreement.

The thing that should give pause to the Heads of State Western is like Putin did in freeing Russia from those who wanted to bring the total economic and social collapse and beat up in jail all those who have tried. Are they influencing Lubawitschern Putin? The fact is that Putin is loyal to Russia and its people, and never allow anyone, even when he is in command in that nation, to sell out his country and into the clutches of the NWO. . . .

Read the whole article.

Soros funds Chaos in America — Gives $33 million to #BlackLivesMatter

From Infowars by Paul Joseph Watson

Soros funds Ferguson Riots to the tune of $33 million. Image Credits:By Loavesofbread, Wikimedia Commons

[T]he Washington Times revealed, MORE was one of the groups that received a share of the $33 million invested into the #BlackLivesMatter movement by billionaire George Soros.

As Weasel Zippers documents, the list contains several names of key #BlackLivesMatter organizers, including Lisa Fithian, who spent time in Ferguson last year training demonstrators to “simulate chaos”.

“Also of note, you can see that some people are being paid to travel to other places to protest, you can see the travel to Selma, and to D.C., as well as money paid out for ‘vans’, including to a union for providing the vans. Elizabeth Vega got $2000 for ‘activist trip to Baltimore’,” reports the website.

The list also includes a big payout to Jeff Ordower, the founder of MORE and an organizer for the SEIU and ACORN.

Millenial Activists United was another Ferguson protest group that received over $2,000 from the Soros front organization. . . .

Read the whole article.

George Soros Behind Riots in Baltimore

From Intellihub by Brandon Turbeville, Activist Post

You talkin’ to me?

While Baltimore burns, the city has proven itself to be yet another staging ground in a long line of scenes involving “violent protests,” riots, and racial violence following an incident concerning police brutality, real or otherwise.

Although the issues that have set off the spark in most of these protests were entirely legitimate, government agencies, foundations, organizations, and NGOs immediately swooped in to divert the protests into racially charged fit throwing and often violent riots.

With a carefully orchestrated network that was capable of organizing large numbers of individuals on a moment’s notice, and a simultaneous media campaign that cleverly showed violence and riots but ignored peaceful or appropriately-directed violent acts, these organizations were able to turn what could and should have been a national movement into a racially-oriented hate-filled display of unrestrained destruction.

With this in mind, one might justifiably ask how these organizations might have such an effective network that operates in concert with a national corporate media apparatus in order to wreck legitimate movements and, out of those movements, create a counter-productive act of mindless fit-throwing?

The answer is the same as it has often been in Europe – the color revolution apparatus and George Soros.

Indeed, George Soros has been heavily involved in the social unrest and movement-wrecking activity that has taken place all across the United States in recent months. From Florida to Ferguson and now to Baltimore, George Soros’ Foundations have been involved in making sure that not only are American citizens unable to overcome racial divisions with mutual cooperation but that even the racially isolated participants are unable to accomplish anything of substance. . . .

Read the whole article.

Another Paid-for Protest? #MillionStudentMarch Campus Uprising Has George Soros Written All over It

From the Daily Sheeple by Melissa Dykes

we don't know what we want, but we want it now. Image Credits: By David Shankbone, Wikimedia Commons

We don’t know what we want, but we want it now. Image Credits: By David Shankbone, Wikimedia Commons

The pot is being stirred. It’s no coincidence that WAPO published an article two days ago about how college campuses are once again becoming “civil rights battlegrounds”. It’s also no surprise at all that the nationwide protest going down today is timed perfectly to piggy back off the media outcry over the University of Missouri protests, either.

In what is being called “a day of action,” a highly organized, scripted, and surely bought-and-paid-for #MillionStudentMarch is scheduled to take place on 106 colleges campuses across America today.

The #MillionStudentMarch movement has its own website at started by Elan Axelbank, a Northwestern student and activist member of the Socialist Alternative movement who also has enough time on his hands as a student to co-found not only the Million Student March but 15 Now, a group that demands to “end poverty wages” by making the national minimum wage $15/hour.

The Million Student March demands free college tuition, a cancellation of all student loan debt, and not surprisingly, a $15 minimum wage for all campus workers.

* * *

The #MillionStudentMarch is somehow described as a “grassroots effort” organized at the local level:

Million Student March is a grassroots effort, organized at the local level by existing campus and activist groups as well as new coalitions and organizations formed specifically for Nov. 12.

…but it is also noted that:

MSM is coordinated at the national level by a committee responsible for administration and communications, and that produces organizing materials and builds relationships with other activist groups and unions. …

Read the whole article.

College students demand a safe space:

Waa! . . . Waa! . . . Waa!

Is Windows 10 Malware?

Is Windows 10 Malware? Image Credits: By wwward0.Jangelo9397, Wikimedia Commons.

Is Windows 10 Malware? I’ve been having a lot of troubles with my PC lately; not just with Microsoft Internet Explorer but also with Firefox, and Google Chrome — computer lock ups, recover webpage popups, stop script popups, with open tabs reloading, causing me to lose stuff whenever I opened a new window; and, also, IE has stoped working dialog boxes, IE has stopped working and was forced to shut down and reopen this tab dialog boxes, and so on. So, I ran a full scan, got rid of all my cookies and temporary files, then did disk optimization — a number of times. Then, when I got my latest Window updates, the problem even got worse.

I’m running Windows 8.1, not that I wanted it, but because it just decided to download itself onto my computer and replace my Windows 8. And it did it right in the middle of when I was working on something on Adobe Illustrator — thank God I had just clicked save half a minute before it took over my computer and I didn’t lose much, but . . .

But back to my troubles. My problems were intermittent: sometimes everything would work fine; I could keep a dozen or so windows open, going back and forth with no problems at all, and other days were a nightmare. So, I thought maybe I should get Windows 10 with its new Edge Browser: Microsoft popups kept making their appearance, saying I could get it for free, and not a trial, but yours to keep for ever and ever. Then I read up on it and decided maybe not.

So what’s going on? Was Windows 8.1 and IE under some sort of hacking attack? Then I read the Following. Maybe some lawyer should bring a class action suit.

Windows 10 Is Malware; Deletes Users’ Programs

From New American by :

Windows 10 seems to be Microsoft’s deliberate attempt at creating the most intrusive operating system ever. If that is the goal, the software giant from Redmond, Washington, is succeeding. It seems that every new update brings the newest iteration of Windows increasingly closer to giving Microsoft total control over the way users can operate their own computers. The most recent update makes that abundantly clear.

Malware is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition as:

Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer functions or sends personal data about the user to unauthorized parties over the Internet.

While computer users typically think of that definition applying to viruses, it unfortunately fits Windows 10 — and increasingly Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 — very well. What else do you call an operating system that reports back to its developers supplying them with personally identifiable information about you including your name, e-mail address, postal address, phone number, passwords, password hints, age, and gender, as well as your browsing history, address book, calendar, the contents of your e-mails, and access to all your files including pictures, videos, documents, and anything else stored on your hard drive? What about an operating system that while doing all that hides updates from you, will not provide you information about them, and installs them even when you have told it not to? What about that same operating system being designed in such a way that you cannot even turn off these settings?

If none of that rises to the level of defining Windows 10 (and, because of updates, Windows 7, 8, and 8.1) as malware, the most recent news certainly does. The New American has previously reported on the outrageous Microsoft Services Agreement and accompanying documents that must be agreed to before any Microsoft product or service can be used. We explained:

Few will ever read the terms of these documents since they span some 40,000 words and would run 110 pages if printed. As is to be expected, most of the terms are written in legalese and are not overly easy to understand. There are some parts of the terms that users need to be aware of, though, because agreeing to them grants Microsoft the right to read, save, and share anything stored on or accessed using any computer running Microsoft Windows as well as any computer using Microsoft products or services.

The Microsoft Services Agreement also gives the software empire permission to not only install whatever software it chooses on your computer, but also to delete whatever software it chooses from your computer. Microsoft announced its Windows 10 November update with great fanfare. What the company did not tell users was that the update would give Microsoft the ability to reach into their computers and remove software that the company deemed either unstable (based on its own criteria) or pirated (based on its own assumptions). Just whose computer is it, anyway? . . .

Read the whole article — you should.