Celebrities Will Leave if Trump Wins. Didn’t they all make the Same Threat Over Dubya winning the Election?

Celebrities will leave if Trump wins

Celebrities will leave if Trump wins. Of course they will. Image Credits: By Wilson Simonard, Wikimedia Commons


Celebrities will leave if Trump wins? Haven’t we been down this road before? Remember back in 2000 when a whole bunch of celebrities such as Cher and Alec Baldwin threatened to leave the country if Dubya won the election. Well, Dubya won and none of the celebs made good on their promise to leave.

This time the same full-of-hot-air group is again threatening to flee the country, only this time Donald J. Trump Jr. is offering to pay their airfare.

I doubt any of them will leave this time around, either, because, other than talking sh*t, their good buddy Barrack has made it very difficult if not impoaaible for Americans to live outside the country with new banking laws that he passed.

Donald Trump Jr. Offers To Buy Airfare For Celebs Who Would Flee U.S. Over Prez Trump

From TPM by

After a slew of celebrities vowed to leave the country if Donald Trump is elected President, one of the Republican frontrunner’s sons offered to pay for their plane tickets.
“I’ll buy their airfare! I’m more than happy to chip in,” Donald Trump Jr. said Monday during an interview on “Fox and Friends.”

Eric Trump chimed in to say those remarks – from the likes of reverend Al Sharpton, Jon Stewart, and Cher – are the “greatest endorsement ever” for their father’s presidential campaign. . . . (more)

Hillary Wins South Carolina: Claims We Don’t Need To Make America Great, We Need Me

‘Instead of Building Walls, We Need To Be Tearing Down Barriers’:

Hillary wins South Carolina

Hillary wins South Carolina, then claims we need to tear down the wall and let the hordes rush in.

Hillary wins South Carolina, then loses it with crazy talk. Hillary must think she’s Ronald Regan : “Mr. Trump . . . tear down this wall.” Of course, a wall already does exist. A wall, or an Iron Curtain if you prefer, in the form tax laws that keep Americans in.

No need to Make America great, says Hillary, the status quo is just fine. We just need to protect Wall Street and open the borders to all who would come (Cloward-Piven).


Hillary: ‘We Don’t Need to Make America Great,’ ‘Instead of Building Walls, We Need To Be Tearing Down Barriers’

From Breitbart by Ian Hanchett

Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton argued, “we don’t need to make America great. America has never stopped being great. … Instead of building walls, we need to be tearing down barriers” in a speech after winning Saturday’s South Carolina Democratic primary.

* * *

Hillary later said, “America isn’t a single issue country, my friends. We need more than a plan for the biggest banks.” . . . (more)

Trump vs Hillary Equals Trump vs Goldman; Let the Games Begin

Trump vs Hillary

Trump vs Hillary = Trump vs Goldman. Image Credits: by Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons


Trump vs Hillary equals Trump vs the Oligarchy. The game is rigged but if enough people come out and vote, then they’ll be able to override the fixed game and the people will win.


 

Snowden Sums Up The Presidential Campaign With Just One Tweet

From Zero Hedge

And so, just like that, with a sweeping victory in South Carolina, Sanders’ Socialism crawls back into its cage and crony capitalism is alive and well.

As Edward Snowden so perfectly sums up…

Since 2013 Hillary’s grand total is slightly less: $21.7 million for 92 private appearances.

And as The Mises Institute’s William Andersen so eloquently summarised,

Despite Clinton’s newfound populist rhetoric, her economic agenda reflects her own lifestyle of practicing crony capitalism. Other than her promise to remove “red tape” for small business startups, Clinton’s economic propositions follow the same depressing line that we have seen from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren: private enterprise extracts wealth from the economy, while the expansion of government power builds wealth and employment opportunities.

If one briefly can summarize Clinton’s policy-making viewpoints, it is this: Hillary Clinton believes that an economy should be a tool of the state and reflect the political interests of Washington. Anything else is called “greed,” or “profits before people.” Private employers and business owners should not seek to be profitable, but rather to be virtuous, with the necessary virtue being decided by Clinton herself.

Hillary Clinton, a beneficiary of the very worst aspects of crony capitalism, has decided after all that she is an economic populist who wants to “share the wealth.” No one is mistaking her for Bernie Sanders or even Huey Long, but, nonetheless, she is a thoroughgoing statist telling voters that the way to improve the economy is to make it more difficult to produce things and force up business costs.

* * *

The turnout at Trump rallies has been unlike anything seen in presidential primaries; and what’s more, the GOP voter turnout in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada set new records for the party.

Yet voter turnout for the Clinton-Sanders race has fallen, in every contest, below what it was in the Clinton-Obama race in 2008.

Bernie’s millennials aside, the energy and excitement has been on the Republican contest, often a sign of party ascendancy.

Not only would Trump at the top of the GOP ticket assure a huge turnout (pro and con), he is the quintessence of the anti-Washington, anti-establishment candidate in a year when Americans appear to want a wholesale housecleaning in the capital.

As a builder and job creator, Trump would surely have greater cross-party appeal to working-class Democrats than any traditional Republican politician. Moreover, when Bernie Sanders goes down to defeat, how much enthusiasm will his supporters, who thrilled to the savaging of Wall Street, bring to the Clinton campaign?

This is the year of the outsider, and Hillary is the prom queen of Goldman Sachs. She represents continuity. Trump represents change. . . . (more)

Syria Proxy War — America vs. America Equals Self-Annihilation?

Syria proxy war: America dancing with itself


Syria proxy war

Syria proxy war — America at its finest: Situation Normal All F*cked Up

Syria proxy war: American backed rebels fighting American backed rebels: ISIS vs. ISIS.

Backing both sides is hardly anything new for America and the Military Industrial Complex: the ultimate money pit, and you get to pay for it.


Now America Is Literally Fighting a Proxy War in Syria with Itself

From The Daily Sheeple by Melissa Dykes

That whole overthrowing Assad regime change plan is quickly devolving into the plot of a bad action comedy TV show. Buzzfeed is reporting that America is now openly engaged in a proxy war with itself in Syria.

Syrian rebel battalions that have been cashing not-so-covert-anymore checks from Uncle Sam are currently engaged in fighting other Syrian rebels who are also being supported with cash and weapons by the U.S. government. . . . (more)

Trump vs Rubio with an Assist from Dana Bash

Image Credits: by Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons

Trump vs Rubio: Marco and Dana Bash try tag teaming Trump. Image Credits: by Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons

Trump vs Rubio: CNN’s Dana Bash and Marco Rubio try to get the better of Trump by asking the same question over and over again and then saying they got the best of him because he didn’t come up with a different answer every time. Rubio (Mr. Roboto) going so far as accusing Trump of repeating himself.

This is an old and oh so transparent reporter’s, or should I say newsperson-presenter’s trick, hoping that the person they’re interviewing gets stupid and gives the answer they’re looking for: another one of their gotcha techniques, and also — doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result — the definition of insanity.

Trump’s answer was simple, straight forward, and direct: Competition lowers prices, the end. That’s all you need to know! End of story. That’s why new products that start out very expensive almost always end up being pretty cheap: take mobile phones or calculators, for example.

But simple straight forward solutions are never part of the Establishment’s solutions; expensive, bureaucratic nightmares with plenty of opportunities for corruption, graft, and outright theft are.

Rubio sends Trump into repeat mode [ yeah, right. You Wish –ed.]

Donald Trump said he would get rid of the rules that prohibit the selling of insurance across state lines.

From Politico by Shane Goldmacher

HOUSTON — Marco Rubio wanted Donald Trump to get specific.

“What is your plan?” he asked of Trump’s plan to replace President Obama’s health care law. “What is your plan on health care?” The answer led to one of the sharpest exchanges of the night.

Trump said he would get rid of the rules that prohibit the selling of insurance across state lines. “When you get rid of the lines, it brings in competition,” Trump said. “It will be a beautiful thing.”

Rubio wanted more. “So that ‘s the only part?” he said. “Just the lines?”

Trump began to talk about the lines again when Rubio pounced. “Now he’s repeating himself,” Rubio chided as Trump went on.

“Don’t repeat yourself,” Rubio said, flashing a wide smile. . . . (more)

Rubio Trump — Rubio Says You Don’t Win the Nomination by Winning States

Rubio Trump: "You win elections by not winning," says Rubio.

Rubio Trump: “You win elections by not winning,” says Rubio. Image Credits: by Michael Vadon, Wikimedia Commons


Rubio Trump: Rubio claims that the majority of Republicans don’t want Trump and that you don’t you don’t win the nomination by winning states. Hmm. So how do you win, Marco? By having the Establishment hand it to you at the convention, or do you have some sort of weird science in mind?


Rubio Trump — Marco Rubio: “You Don’t Win The Nomination By How Many States You Win”

From  TPM by

Following another second-place finish in the Nevada GOP caucus, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) argued Wednesday that candidates don’t win presidential primaries simply by winning individual states.

When asked about his loss to Donald Trump in the Nevada caucus on Tuesday on “Fox and Friends,” Rubio noted that “this is an unusual election.”

“And right now, what you have is a situation where Donald—the majority of the Republican electorate, the majority of Republican voters in this country do not want Donald Trump to be the nominee,” Rubio said. . . . (more)

Marco Rubio Gay? Sure He Went to Gay Sex parties, But you’ve Got it All Wrong.

Is Marco Rubio gay? Not that there’s anything wrong with that unless you’re presenting yourself as a fundamentalist Christian who’s opposed to gay marriage.

Rubio goes on The Tonight Show to try to get a jump on the story before it gets out of hand. A sympathetic Jimmy Fallon shows that, hey, he wears “gay” boots, too, and he’s not gay, right? So no big deal. Then Fallon clinches it by showing the infamous photo of a limp wristed, submissively weak spined Rubio, clad in gay sweater and wearing high heeled boots, getting on a bus. Good work Jimmy: you sure convinced us. Gay? No way!

But here’s the zinger: Rubio admits to going to [gay] foam parties . . . once! Didn’t everybody back in the day?

ONCE? Kind of reminds me of Bill Clinton’s smoking pot but he didn’t inhale. Uh-huh.

Is Marco Rubio Gay

Is Marco Rubio Gay? Just because he comes across as a limp wristed dandy and used to go to half-naked homosexual dance parties doesn’t mean a thing.

And what exactly are these foam parties that Marco admits to having attended? No Big Deal: “The scene generally features several hundred scantily clad bodies packed onto a dance floor and writhing to bone-rattling music under strobes and colored lights. Nothing new, right? Until suds come gushing out of a machine suspended over the dance floor. As if on cue, various forms of passionate embrace begin. Kissing. Petting. Rubbing. Because the foam froths up waist high, it acts both as a lubricant and camouflage. Mutual masturbation is an occasional component, generally beneath the cover of foam. As the evening wears on, a few men pair off and sit together in the foam that builds up outside the partitioned-off area.”

At “Amnesia,” emcee “Kitty Meow, a drag queen, would officiate over the foam parties, directing participants what to do. Some foam party participants only wore jock straps. It is entirely possible that Rubio did meet his future wife at a foam party, but the women who attended these functions were largely what are known as “fag hags” out to have a good time while at the same time avoid being hit on by the gay men. . . .(more)

Mandatory Automatic Braking System for Cars? Sounds Dangerous to Me

512px-Car_Accident

Automatic braking system? No thanks. Image Credits: By W. Robert Howell from Charlotte, NC, Wikimedia Commons

Just how dangerous is an automatic braking system? Sounds pretty dangerous to me. As I look back over my many years of driving, I can think of many situations where I saved myself from crashing not by hitting the brakes but by hitting the gas, an option you will no longer have.

For instance, by having your cars brakes apply automatically you could end up boxed in behind someone where you are now trapped in a situation where you’ve just become a sitting duck waiting to be crushed by the trailer truck behind you when you could have hit the gas and been out of there.

Another bad and dangerous idea brought to you by a central government that wants to control everything, even at the risk of your life.


Mandatory Automatic Braking For All!

From Eric Peters Autos

I recently wrote about the Fading Away of the manual transmission (see here). As it turns out, I was wrong.

Manuals will not fade away.

They will be regulated out of existence.

Here’s how – and why.

Federal bureaucrats intend to mandate automated braking in all new cars – if the car companies don’t install these systems in every car they sell on their own initiative.

These systems – which use radar proximity sensors to detect the presence of an object in the car’s path and apply the brakes automatically  if the driver doesn’t – are already in about a third of 2016 model year cars, but not yet force-fed to the public by government edict.

That’s about to change.

Obama’s transportation secretary, Anthony Foxx says  “We are entering a new era of vehicle safety, focusing on preventing crashes from ever occurring rather than just protecting occupants when crashes happen.”   

GM, Ford, Toyota, VW, Mercedes, BMW and Volvo have already committed – on their own – to making automated braking standard equipment in all their models within the next few years. They have learned to love Big Brother. That it can be profitable to love Big Brother. “Safety” sells. Especially when you can’t say no to it.

The insurance mafia is also pushing this.

Insurance Institute for  Highway Safety consiglierie Adrian Lund says , “This technology can compensate for the mistakes every driver makes because the systems are always on alert.”

Because, of course, computers never make mistakes.

One could (and I will) dissect this babble pretty easily to get to the meat of the matter, which has about as much to do with “safety” as the TSA has to do with “security.”

Ever hear of the Hegelian dialectic? Create a problem… then offer a solution. The problem created in this case is a nation of dumbed-down drivers made so by diminished expectations and compounded by endless browbeating that anything but the most passive behavior behind the wheel is akin to driving 120 MPH blind drunk with your pants down and a Vegas whore administering oral love.

Solution? Presume all drivers are addled imbeciles – and treat everyone (including non-imbeciles) accordingly.

It is the automotive analog of what writer William Burroughs said 40-something years ago about what they (the government) does after every mass shooting. That is, they go after the people who didn’t do it.     

But how does this amount to the death knell of the manual transmission? . . . (more)

Scalia Hunting Society or “Surviving the Game” with a Different Ending?

1024px-Frans_Snyders_004

Scalia hunting society a set-up for a clay pigeon? A-hunting we will go, a-hunting we will go, Heigh-ho, the derry-o, a-hunting we will go.

Scalia hunting society? A secretive hunting society with a Grand Master who all wear dark green robes. Sounds a lot like the hunting society Ice-T was invited to join in the clip below.

Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters

From The Washington Post via MSN News

When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died 11 days ago at a West Texas ranch, he was among high-ranking members of an exclusive fraternity for hunters called the International Order of St. Hubertus, an Austrian society that dates back to the 1600s.

After Scalia’s death Feb. 13, the names of the 35 other guests at the remote resort, along with details about Scalia’s connection to the hunters, have remained largely unknown. A review of public records shows that some of the men who were with Scalia at the ranch are connected through the International Order of St. Hubertus, whose members gathered at least once before at the same ranch for a celebratory weekend.

Members of the worldwide, male-only society wear dark-green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto “Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes,” which means “Honoring God by honoring His creatures,” according to the group’s website. Some hold titles, such as Grand Master, Prior and Knight Grand Officer. The Order’s name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen. . . . (more)

Is Marco Rubio Gay? Looks Like It Goes Deeper Than That!

Is Marco Rubio gay? Just what is Rubio hiding?

Is Marco Rubio gay?

Is Marco Rubio gay? What is he hiding? Image Credits: by Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons


Living the Vida Loca. Is Marco Rubio gay, a flaming homosexual? It would appear that way. Was he a gay prostitute and coke dealer? The perfect guest for Bohemian Grove? Stay tuned: the plot thickens.


 

January 29-31, 2016 — WMR REPORTING FROM FLORIDA — Rubio’s coke house, gayish dance troupe, and foam parties

From Wayne Madsen Report

Republican insiders have reported to WMR that Florida Senator and presidential candidate Marco Rubio was, as a high school and college student, known to be a very extroverted homosexual in both South Beach in Miami, a popular gay area, and at college in Gainesville, Florida.

In 1989, a year before Rubio was arrested with his friend Angel Barrios and another unidentified male friend in Alice Wainwright Park in south Miami, ostensibly for drinking beer in a car after closing time in a park known as a pickup locale for gays, Rubio sang and danced in a South Miami High School troupe. The song and dance troupe was based on the Chippendales but with a very gay theme: half Chippendales and half Village People. Rubio omitted his participation in the dance troupe in his biography, “American Son.”

It is also significant that Rubio did not have the best parent models in growing up in Florida and Las Vegas. His Cuban parents, according to GOP insiders, did not emigrate from Cuba to escape Fidel Castro and Communism — they left Cuba for America in 1956 — but were Havana casino workers employed by Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky and brought to Florida. From Miami, they eventually left for Las Vegas to work in mob-owned casino hotels. Rubio’s father, Mario Rubio Reina, worked as a bartender in Las Vegas casinos while his mother, Oriales Rubio, was a hotel maid. Rubio has falsely claimed that his parents fled Castro and Communism. In 1956, the U.S.-supported fascist dictator, Fulgencio Batista, was fully in control of Cuba.

After flunking out of Tarkeo College in Missouri, Rubio returned to Miami where he hung around with his old high school friend Barrios. Barrios started an on-line gay porn business called Flava Works, which is still in business today live streaming sexual acts between black and Latino men. . . . (more, including gay pics)