Is Obama a Traitor: the Secret Leader of ISIL?

Is Obama a traitor

Harun meets with Charlemagne. A Caliphate needs a Caliph — Is Obama a traitor or the secret leader, the Caliph, of ISIS which he so fondly calls ISIL.

Why is it that Obama always refers to ISIS (Islamic state of Iraq and Syria — I thought he said it had nothing to do with Muslims) as ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant)?

And why is it that he always refers to ISIS as a Caliphate when ISIS has no Caliph? Could Obama be the Caliph of the Caliphate he refers to as ISIL? Is Obama a traitor and the secret leader, the Caliph, of ISIS?

There is no doubt now that the United States and its NATO ally Turkey back ISIS with arms and cash, and as far as Obama goes, apparently moral support, aka giving aid and comfort to the enemy. But just what is it he means when he says ISIL and not ISIS? Is it a coded message to Jihadi fighters to keep fighting, to not worry: America’s got your back.

Whatever the case may be, Barry is no Harun al-Rashid (See Rock Hudson in The Golden Blade).

From Now the End Begins:

Decoding Obama’s speech reveals some startling revelations

ISIL stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. Now, to us Westerners we don’t really make much of a distinction, do we? No, honestly from our perspective its all about the same. But how would a Muslim living in the Middle East view it? Just what is the Levant anyway? Let’s take a look. …

… When Barack Obama refers over and over to the Islamic State as ISIL, he is sending a message to Muslims all over the Middle East that he personally does not recognize Israel as a sovereign nation, but as territory belonging to the Islamic State. …

Read the whole article.

New York Times Claims That Paris Attacks Help Clinton Hurt Trump

Paris attacks help Clinton hurt Trump

Paris attacks help Clinton hurt Trump. Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive! — Sir Walter Scott

Truth be damned — in a world turned upside down, the New York Times claims that Paris attacks help Clinton harm Trump as Hillary argues that we’re not doing enough to bring more Syrian refugees to America.

Politicians and their operatives are constantly spinning, trying to create their own reality, trying to paint a picture of the way they’d like you to see things and not necessarily the way that they are.

In a 2004 New York Times Magazine article, Journalist Ron Suskind, quoting Karl Rove, wrote —

[G]uys like me [Suskind] were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” … “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he [Rove] continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

Paris Attacks Help Clinton hurt Trump —

From the New York Times via MSN News:

Why the Paris Attacks Probably Won’t Change the Election’s Outcome

. . . The horrific attacks that took place Friday in Paris have, at least for the moment, changed that dynamic. CBS quickly moved to increase the emphasis on foreign policy and national security during Saturday night’s Democratic debate. Candidates are scrambling to adjust to the news, which media analysis has suggested might “alter” the character of the race, for instance by helping more experienced candidates like Hillary Rodham Clinton and hurting outsiders like Donald Trump.

* * *

Even the killing of Osama bin Laden had little discernible effect on President Obama’s approval ratings. One initial piece of evidence in favor of this hypothesis: Prices in betting markets tracked by David Rothschild of Microsoft Research over the weekend showed virtually no change in the expected winners of the Democratic and Republican presidential nominations or the general election.

* * *

We should also be careful about attributing future events to the attacks. It will be tempting to construct post-Paris narratives in which voters are more likely to select a candidate who can capably serve as commander in chief. But research and history suggest that the primary process is already likely to winnow out outsider and factional candidates like Bernie Sanders, Ben Carson and Mr. Trump who can’t attract widespread support within their party — precisely the sort whose prospects the attacks might seem most likely to damage. In other words, if the Paris attacks hadn’t happened, some other rationale would have probably been used to force them to the sideline.

* * *

If the economic expansion continues, don’t be surprised if you hear Republicans frequently invoking the Paris attacks as a reminder of Mrs. Clinton’s failure to help head off the ISIS threat when she was secretary of state. . . .

Read the whole article.

So, there you have it: The Paris attacks will help Clinton but hurt Trump. I’m not quite sure how that will work when Trump has been against bringing in more immigrants, particularly in light of the fact that there not even enough jobs for Americans, particularly illegal immigrants, particularly single males of military conscription age from a Jihadi war zone who are impossible to accurately vet.

Hillary, on the other hand, battled hard to define herself as the candidate who would bring in the most Syrian “refugees” (I use that word lightly because many are just responding to the advertised free housing, free healthcare, and free income that Obama has so generously offered to provide. Hell, who wouldn’t) in the Nov. 14th Democratic debate that was scheduled for a Saturday night, a night that would be likely to attract the least viewers.

Then we have David Rothschild’s research that showed virtually no change in the expected winners of the Democratic and Republican presidential nominations or the general election. Yet we have Rothschild predicting that Republican favorite Trump will somehow lose and the nominee will be who? Jeb? Kasich? Not bloody likely.

In response to the Paris attacks Ann Coulter Tweeted, “They can wait if they like until next November for the actual balloting, but Donald Trump was elected president tonight.”

As to the supposed economic expansion, who ya going to believe, the Obama Administration and their propaganda outlets or your lying eyes?

From Alt-Market:

It is undeniable; the final collapse triggers are upon us, triggers alternative economists have been warning about since the initial implosion of 2008. In the years since the derivatives disaster, there has been no end to the absurd and ludicrous propaganda coming out of mainstream financial outlets and as the situation in markets becomes worse, the propaganda will only increase. This might seem counter-intuitive to many. You would think that the more obvious the economic collapse becomes, the more alternative analysts will be vindicated and the more awake and aware the average person will be. Not necessarily…

In fact, the mainstream spin machine is going into high speed the more negative data is exposed and absorbed into the markets. If you know your history, then you know that this is a common tactic by the establishment elite to string the public along with false hopes . . .

Read whole article.

Russia Bombs ISIS — Does in 72 Hours What US Couldn’t Do in Years

Russia bombs ISIS — does in 72 hours what US couldn't do in years

Russia bombs ISIS — does in 72 hours what US couldn’t do in years

Russia bombs ISIS and does in 72 hours what Washington couldn’t do in years.

From Zero Hedge by Tyler Durden

Russia Claims ISIS Now On The Ropes As Fighters Desert After 60 Airstrikes In 72 Hours

One question that’s been asked repeatedly over the past thirteen months is why Washington has been unable to achieve the Pentagon’s stated goal of “degrading and defeating” ISIS despite the fact that the “battle” pits the most advanced air force on the planet against what amounts to a ragtag band of militants running around the desert in basketball shoes.

Those of a skeptical persuasion have been inclined to suggest that perhaps the US isn’t fully committed to the fight. Explanations for that suggestion range from the mainstream (the White House is loathe to get the US into another Mid-East war) to the “conspiratorial” (the CIA created ISIS and thus doesn’t want to destroy the group due to its value as a strategic asset).

The implication in all of this is that a modern army that was truly determined to destroy the group could likely do so in a matter of months if not weeks and so once Russia began flying sorties from Latakia, the world was anxious to see just how long the various rebel groups operating in Syria could hold up under bombardment by the Russian air force.

The answer, apparently, is “less than a week.”

On Saturday, the Russian Ministry of Defense said it has conducted 60 bombing runs in 72 hours, hitting more than 50 ISIS targets.

According to the ministry (Facebook page is here), Islamic State fighters are in a state of “panic” and more than 600 have deserted. 

Here’s what happens when the Russians locate a terrorist “command center”:

* * *

Now obviously one must consider the source here, but Kremlin spin tactics aside, one cannot help but be amazed with the pace at which this is apparently unfolding. If any of the above is even close to accurate, it means that Russia is on schedule to declare victory over ISIS (and everyone else it looks like) in a matter of weeks, which would not only be extremely embarrassing for Washington, but would also effectively prove that the US has never truly embarked on an honest effort to rid Syria of the extremist groups the Western media claims are the scourge of humanity.

Summed up in 10 priceless seconds…

Read the whole article.

Obama Warns Russia Over Military Action in Syria: Could Turn Into Quagmire

Diving into a quagmire — Obama warns Russia over military action in Syria: could turn into quagmire

Diving into a quagmire — Obama warns Russia over military action in Syria: could turn into quagmire

Obama warns Russia over military action in Syria — Obama is a Joke. Of course, a lot of us have known that for a long time, like from day one when he told us that the only people who could fix Wall Street were the people who broke it. Others, however, are still believers in awe at the marvels and wonders worked by the first black president and Harvard Law grad to boot (yuk-yuk).

And now, out of goodness of heart, the Big Zero is passing along a little friendly advice to his dear friend Vlad: you don’t want to go into Syria. Look how long we’ve been there without making headway. Oops, looks like Russia accomplished more in a couple of days than Obama’s pretend efforts did in a couple of years. Looks like Russia has blown the cover of the Globalist puppet Obama’s effort to flood Europe with jihadi refugees and bring down the West.

Obama warns Russia’s Putin of ‘quagmire’ in Syria

From Reuters by Alistair Bell and Tom Perry

U.S. President Barack Obama warned Russia on Friday that its bombing campaign against Syrian rebels will suck Moscow into a “quagmire,” after a third straight day of air raids in support of President Bashar al-Assad.

At a White House news conference, Obama frequently assailed Russian President Vladimir Putin, who he accused of acting out of a position of weakness to defend a crumbling, authoritarian ally.

Friday prayers were canceled in insurgent-held areas of Syria’s Homs province hit by Russian warplanes this week, with residents concerned that mosques could be targeted, according to one person from the area.

Putin’s decision to launch strikes on Syria marks a dramatic escalation of foreign involvement in a more than four-year-old civil war in which every major country in the region has a stake.

It also gives fuel to domestic critics of Obama who say his unwillingness to act on Syria has allowed Moscow to stage its biggest show of force in the Middle East in decades.

But the U.S. president warned that Russia and Iran, Assad’s main backer in the Muslim world, have isolated the majority of Syrians and angered their Sunni Muslim neighbors.

“An attempt by Russia and Iran to prop up Assad and try to pacify the population is just going to get them stuck in a quagmire and it won’t work,” Obama said. . . .

Read the whole article.

Russia Shuts Down Globalist Plan — Check, Checkmate?

Russia Shuts Down Globalist Plan —

Russia shuts down Globalist plan. Joel Skousen of World’s Affairs Brief breaks it down with Alex Jones.

Russian Airstrike Syrian Civilian Casualties — Info Appeared Before Jets Left Ground

Russian airstrike Syrian civilian casualties — Info appeared before jets left ground

The whole truth and nothing but the truth. Russian airstrike Syrian civilian casualties — Info appeared before jets left ground.

Russian Airstrike Syrian Civilian Casualties — Info Appeared Before Jets Left Ground. Sort of remind me of the collapse of WTC building being reported on the TV news before the building came down. But then the news readers who call themselves reporters will read whatever script you put in front of them and sometimes jump the gun.

Info on Civilian Casualties Appeared Before Russian Jets in Syrian Airspace

Information on casualties among civilians appeared in Western media before Russian aircraft left ground, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday.

Media reports about civilians in Syria allegedly being killed by Russian airstrikes appeared before Russian aircraft even left the ground, President Vladimir Putin said Thursday.

“As for any information in the media on civilians suffering [from Russian airstrikes], we were ready for such information attacks. I draw your attention to the fact that the first reports on civilian casualties emerged before our planes even left the ground,” Putin said at a meeting of the Russian Council for Civil Society and Human Rights.

Russia launched an aerial campaign on Wednesday, at the request of Syrian President Bashar Assad, targeting eight IS military hardware, arms and fuel depots. Almost immediately, Western media outlets carried reports of civilian casualties. . . .

Read the whole article.

Putin Schools Obama

Putin schools Obama

Putin schools Obama

Putin Schools Obama . . . I feel a shift in the balance of power from the Eagle to the Bear as Obama’s planned European Caliphate bites the dust. Thanks to Obama the force is no longer with us, and maybe that’s a good thing.

From Lew Rockwell by Patrick J. Buchanan

The Mind of Mr. Putin

… A dozen years after George W. Bush invaded Iraq, ISIS occupies its second city, Mosul, controls its largest province, Anbar, and holds Anbar’s capital, Ramadi, as Baghdad turns away from us — to Tehran.

The cost to Iraqis of their “liberation”? A hundred thousand dead, half a million widows and fatherless children, millions gone from the country and, still, unending war.

How has Libya fared since we “liberated” that land? A failed state, it is torn apart by a civil war between an Islamist “Libya Dawn” in Tripoli and a Tobruk regime backed by Egypt’s dictator.

Then there is Yemen. Since March, when Houthi rebels chased a Saudi sock puppet from power, Riyadh, backed by U.S. ordinance and intel, has been bombing that poorest of nations in the Arab world.

Five thousand are dead and 25,000 wounded since March. And as the 25 million Yemeni depend on imports for food, which have been largely cut off, what is happening is described by one U.N. official as a “humanitarian catastrophe.”

“Yemen after five months looks like Syria after five years,” said the international head of the Red Cross on his return.

On Monday, the wedding party of a Houthi fighter was struck by air-launched missiles with 130 guests dead. Did we help to produce that?

What does Putin see as the ideological root of these disasters?

“After the end of the Cold War, a single center of domination emerged in the world, and then those who found themselves at the top of the pyramid were tempted to think they were strong and exceptional, they knew better.”

Then, adopting policies “based on self-conceit and belief in one’s exceptionality and impunity,” this “single center of domination,” the United States, began to export “so-called democratic” revolutions.

How did it all turn out? Says Putin:

“An aggressive foreign interference has resulted in a brazen destruction of national institutions. … Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty and social disaster.

Nobody cares a bit about human rights, including the right to life.” …

Read the whole article.

War Monger John McCain on Russia in Syria — America Can’t Get No Respect

John McCain on Russia in Syria

John McCain on Russia in Syria. Will Russia save us from ourselves.

War Monger John McCain on Russia in Syria — In the following clip, Insane McCain says that Russia is treating us with the utmost contempt. Really? After we imposed sanctions, threatened a buildup of weapons on their border, and placed tactical missiles along their border to which they have responded in kind? Fancy that.

On Russia launching Air Strikes: “Look, what we should have done,” says McCain, “We should have said we are going to fly any place, anywhere, anyhow, and you better not get in the way: that’s what American leadership would do.”

Good plan, John. And just what are you going to do if they do get in the way because their planes, the SU-30, have a speed of 1320 mph with a range of 1620 miles, while our F-18 Super Hornet has a much slower speed of 1190 mph and a range of only 1270 miles. Both are similarly armed. So, if you’re flying an F-18, you probably don’t want to mess with an SU-30. But as Trump says, he like guys that weren’t shot down.

Fox News then goes on to point out that the Russians are targeting the very groups we are trying to help (that would be ISIS and Al-Qaeda) and asks if he would shoot down Russian Planes. McCain responds that he would not, but: “I might do what we did in Afghanistan many years ago: to give those guys the ability to shoot down those planes — the equipment is available.” He then goes on to claim that Assad has killed his own people with poison gas (not true). And is upset that Russia didn’t give advance warning for the airstrikes (McCain seems to have Putin confused with Mr. “Always let your opponent know what you’re going to do” Obama).

No doubt, Insane McCain would like to pick up the sword and carry on George W’s battle of Gog vs. Magog so that the West can be brought down to its knees, and, out of the ashes, a NWO Phoenix can rise and spread its wings:

Post Cold War-millenarians still identify Gog with Russia, but they now tend to stress his allies among Islamic nations, especially Iran. For the most fervent, the countdown to Armageddon began with the return of the Jews to Israel, followed quickly by further signs pointing to the nearness of the final battle–nuclear weapons, European integration, Israel’s seizure of Jerusalem, and America’s wars in Afghanistan and the Gulf.

In the prelude to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, President George W. Bush told Jacques Chirac that Gog and Magog were at work in the Middle East: “This confrontation is willed by God,” he told the French leader, “who wants us to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins.” Chirac consulted a professor at the Faculty of Theology of the University of Lausanne (Switzerland) to explain Bush’s reference (more).

John McCain is full of Good ideas. Hey, let’s start WWIII.

And, of course, John McCain is a great war hero, so he ought to know, right? See: John McCain POW, Codename Songbird, John McCain’s No War Hero − Advantage Trump, and John McCain, Hero of the U.S.S. Forrestal Fire

And here’s a little more on John McCain’s heroic actions after almost single-handedly sinking the American aircraft carrier U.S.S. Forrestal for those who are interested in his military expertise. From TruthDig by Mary Hershberger:

[O]nly actions by the pilot could have caused any bomb to fall from McCain’s Skyhawk. These sources—who spoke under the condition that they not be publicly identified—agree with each other that, if any bomb fell from the McCain airplane, it was because of actions that he took either in error or panic upon seeing the fire on the deck or in his hasty exit from the plane. Two switches in the cockpit of a Skyhawk need to be thrown to drop such a bomb, according to the sources.

Whatever the circumstances of the fire’s origins, McCain did not stay on deck to help fight the blaze as the men around him did. With the firefighting crew virtually wiped out, men untrained in fighting fires had to pick up the fire hoses, rescue the wounded or frantically throw bombs and even planes over the ship’s side to prevent further tragedy. McCain left them behind and went down to the hangar-bay level, where he briefly helped crew members heave some bombs overboard. After that, he went to the pilot’s ready room and watched the fire on a television monitor hooked to a camera trained on the deck . . .

From Lew Rockwell by Daniel McAdams:

Why is Washington Against Russia Bombing ISIS and Al-Qaeda?

The US has been bombing Syria for a year without permission from the Syrian government and without a UN Security Council resolution authorizing an attack on a sovereign nation. That means US strikes on Syrian soil are illegal according to international law. However the first US response to the Russian strikes against ISIS in Syria was to condemn the Russian government for not coordinating its strikes with the US.

Unsurprisingly, the US mainstream media once again rushed to carry water for the US administration, with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour pondering whether Russia answering the legitimate Syrian government’s request for assistance would open itself up to war crimes charges! In Amanpour’s world there is no crime in a year of bombing a sovereign state with not even a fig leaf UN resolution to back it up. The only crime is to resist the US empire. No wonder in a world of media austerity, Amanpour is a well-compensated regime propagandist.

Rather than welcoming Russian efforts against ISIS and al-Qaeda, the US claims that unless Russia also focuses on removing the Assad government from power its efforts are “doomed to failure.” The US claims to be concerned that the Russians are attacking the “moderate” Syrian rebels trained by the United States — but even US generals have admitted that group consists of a grand total of four or five individuals. So it’s hard to understand the sudden concern. Each new batch of “moderates” the US churns out seems to defect to al-Qaeda or ISIS within minutes of deployment in Syria.

What is interesting is that the US-led coalition dropping bombs on Syria for the past year has yet to even consider the mounting civilian body count from its attacks. Not a word from the US government about large numbers of civilians it has killed in Syria. Yet there is plenty of evidence that the civilian toll taken by American bombs is exceedingly high. The moment the Russians join the fight against ISIS and al-Qaeda in Syria, however, the US suddenly becomes obsessed with civilian deaths — even as no evidence has arisen aside from suspicious reports from opposition-friendly “human rights” organizations that any civilians have been killed in the first day of Russian strikes.

What “evidence” exists of civilian casualties in the Russian strikes comes from the war machine funded Institute for the Study of War (ISW), headed by Victoria Nuland‘s sister-in-law Kimberly Kagan. ISW’s Genevieve Casagrande — a former dolphin expert who quite frankly does not look like a seasoned foreign policy expert —  claimed to know that Russia’s airstrikes “did not hit ISIS militants and rather resulted in a large number of civilian casualties.” Based on what? Only the unquestioning mainstream media could tell us. But of course they do not. . . .

Read the whole article.

But we had to do something about Syria because Assad used Sarin gas on his own people.

From Washington’s Blog by Eric Zuess:

U.S. President Obama’s central case against Syria’s Bashar al-Assad (and his central argument against Assad’s supporter Russia on that matter) is that Assad was behind the sarin gas attack in Ghouta Syria on 21 August 2013 — but it’s all a well-proven lie, as will be shown here.

President Obama said this to the UN on September 24th: “The evidence is overwhelming that the Assad regime used such weapons on August 21st. U.N. inspectors gave a clear accounting that advanced rockets fired large quantities of sarin gas at civilians. These rockets were fired from a regime-controlled neighborhood and landed in opposition neighborhoods.” . . .

Read the whole article.

So there you have it — war mongering idiots like neocon John McCain don’t like the idea that Russia might put an end to their globalist engineered war in Syrian. And I’m sure his good buddy Lindsey Graham who turned every question in the first debate, including one on woman’s health and another on abortion into an opportunity to promote sending troops to Syria.

Senator Lindsey Graham’s Solution to every problem — send troops to Syria

Celebrity endorsements — CFR member Angelina Jolie calls for war in Syria

Caught in a lie – Staged (fake) battle in Syria brought to you by Cooper Anderson and CNN