Are Vaccines Safe? How many smoking Guns Do You Need.

Are vaccines safe?

Are vaccines safe? Bought and paid for science says yes.

Are vaccines safe? The best bought and paid for science that vaccine manufactures could buy says a very definite yes.


From Naturalnews Network by Mike Adams via The Daily Sheeple

Are you surprised by blatant scientific fraud anymore? Every informed person in the world today knows that everything is rigged: the money system, government grants, news media, polls and elections, medicine and even science. In fact, over the last two decades, most “science” has become nothing more than a corrupt system of quackery, fraud, and corporate infiltration of the scientific establishment where “scientists” are turned into corporate prostitutes to fake whatever results produce the most profits.

And now, thanks to Brian Hooker and the Alliance for Natural Health USA, we have yet another bombshell example of the outright quackery and science fakery of the vaccine industry. What you read here will probably not surprise you, but to most people who believe the vaccine propaganda and lies of the criminal medical establishment, these realizations are nothing short of bombshells.

Scientists who are given loads of money by vaccine manufacturers just happen to conclude vaccines are always safe

In this critical review of the scientific literature on vaccines, ANH-USA and Brian Hooker carefully scrutinize the gross scientific flaws and blatant financial conflicts of interests that undermine the most commonly cited scientific studies which “prove” vaccines don’t cause autism. In a startling percentage of these studies, the “scientists” were either directly funded by vaccine manufacturers who stood to profit from vaccine safety whitewashing or served as highly paid expert witnesses to defend vaccine makers against lawsuits.

What we really see in this critical review is a systemic pattern of scientific fraud, criminal corruption and the complete abandonment of research ethics in the relentless quest to “prove” vaccines are safe (and thereby sell more of them to more vaccine victims).

Here, I’ve reprinted just a few of the descriptions from the ANH-USA analysis. Click here for the full paper.

As you read the highlights below, remind yourself that if vaccines are safe, then Hillary Clinton is a saint, chemical pesticides are good for you and mercury enhances brain function.

Conflicts of interest galore! . . . (more)

Obesity: Coca-Cola Funded Scientists discover: It’s Not Your Diet That’s Making You Fat

Coca-Cola says: there is no proof that junk food and sugary drinks make you fat.

Coca-Cola says: there is no proof that junk food and sugary drinks make you fat.

Obesity: Coca-Cola funded Scientists have discovered that it’s not your diet that’s making you fat; it’s lack of exercise. Junk science for junk food? Some might suspect that what Coca-Cola paid for was to get predetermined results. But then, there will always be cynics.

I went from 170 pounds up to 190 pounds at a time when I was doing more exercise than ever before in my life. I went running, bicycling, or rollerblading, usually for two hours, five to seven days a week, spring, summer, and fall; and I pushed it, no lollygagging. Then, in the winter, I went skiing, usually for five hours a day, five to seven days a week. And again, I pushed it: top to bottom nonstop skiing at high speed plus lots of zip-line mogul bashing on competitive mogul courses. And I developed quite an appetite: I ate quite well.

At a hundred and ninety pounds, I’d never been heavier. I was only one hundred and twenty-four when I had graduated from high school, and here I was sixty-six pounds heavier. Sort of like carrying a bag of cement with you wherever you go. One day the button on my pants popped off and ricocheted off the wall — time to lose some weight.

How did I do it? It would have been impossible to exercise any more than I already was without blowing out my back. So I went low carb with decreased consumption and dropped forty pounds, taking me down to 150. So yeah, exercise helps, but what’s key is diet. Remember, there were no fat people in concentration camps. If you stop eating, you will shrink down to your skeleton, then die. So, everything in moderation, eh?

From the New York Times by Anahad O’Connor:

Coca-Cola Funds Scientists Who Shift Blame for Obesity Away From Bad Diets

Coca-Cola, the world’s largest producer of sugary beverages, is backing a new “science-based” solution to the obesity crisis: To maintain a healthy weight, get more exercise and worry less about cutting calories.

The beverage giant has teamed up with influential scientists who are advancing this message in medical journals, at conferences and through social media. To help the scientists get the word out, Coke has provided financial and logistical support to a new nonprofit organization called the Global Energy Balance Network, which promotes the argument that weight-conscious Americans are overly fixated on how much they eat and drink while not paying enough attention to exercise.

“Most of the focus in the popular media and in the scientific press is, ‘Oh they’re eating too much, eating too much, eating too much’ — blaming fast food, blaming sugary drinks and so on,” the group’s vice president, Steven N. Blair, an exercise scientist, says in a recent video announcing the new organization. “And there’s really virtually no compelling evidence that that, in fact, is the cause.” [uh-huh, uh-huh. Yeah, right —Ed.] …

Read the whole article.

So there you have it, scientific proof: There’s no proof that eating too much fast food and sugary drinks will make you fat — the science is in.

Science or Propaganda?

How can a civilization that values Political Correctness over Truth know if it is headed in the right direction or is about to fall off a cliff? If the truth will set you free, will lies enslave you? Is there such a thing as informed consent based on a half-truth or a lie?

From Natural News:

The flow of science in this modern age is largely controlled by just six corporate publishing groups, which by calculated design have been gobbling up the journal market since at least the 1970s. And a new study out of Canada reveals that this mass consolidation of publishing power is, to a large extent, skewing what passes as scientific progress.

Researchers from the University of Montreal pored through the whole of scientific literature published between 1973 and 2013 and found that the publishing realm has changed dramatically during this time. Many smaller publishers have been absorbed into larger ones, for instance, and academic research groups have become increasingly beholden to the interests of these major publishers, which tend to favor large industries like pharmaceuticals and vaccines.

Much of the independence that was once cherished within the scientific community, in other words, has gone by the wayside as these major publishers have taken control and now dictate what types of content get published. The result is a publishing oligopoly in which scientists are muzzled by and [sic] overarching trend toward politically correct, and industry-favoring, “science.” . . .”

Read the whole article: